The reaction of the public to the decisions of the High
Court and Supreme Court to confirm the right of Parliament to debate the
proposals for Brexit has revealed how little many people know, or understand,
of the constitutional procedures which govern the development of law in this
country.
The resulting ‘Brexit Bill’ is a mere 133 words in length, and confers
powers on the Prime Minister to invoke Article 50, whatever that may mean.
This
has happened before: the first Defence of the Realm Act, of August 1914, was
similarly brief and in just over two hundred words opened the gates to a flood
of secondary legislation that was to pervade every aspect of life for the
duration of the war and beyond.
Secondary legislation – rules, orders and
regulations – were issued by the Privy Council and by government departments,
and in many cases by the military authorities.
Parliament failed, or was not
permitted, to perform its duty of oversight and scrutiny of draft legislation
and for over four years we suffered from poorly worded and rushed laws, many of
which were repealed at the end of hostilities.
The lesson from the Great War is that Parliament – not government –
must be involved in the process of legislative development if we are to have
good law.
No comments:
Post a Comment